Brangelina: We're Ready for More!

151. does that mean she's knocked up again?

Posted at 5:23PM on Sep 3rd 2007 by ShoeGal612

152. kinda reminiscent of wood & mia, look what happened there...............only difference, they weren't "beautiful people"...........

Posted at 5:56PM on Sep 3rd 2007 by holy crap !!!

153. The children of Brangelina do NOT get along. Brangelina either can't or won't cope with all the in-fighting. And they want to add more children to the mix, to be either another bully or victim? The most vulnerable child is Shiloh. Now that Maddox has been caught kicking another sibling, he adds to the wildness of Pax and the meanness of jealous Z towards Shiloh. I lost respect for Brad, letting the youngest, Shiloh, continue to be exposed to what Brangelina evidently considers amusing sibling encounters.

Posted at 5:58PM on Sep 3rd 2007 by MyOpinion

154. I think all the bad comment about these two are piteful. Here we have to people who love one another raising children from other countries and having one of their own. Spend alot of time with them. And these children get to see the world. Leave them alone. The only problem I have with them is that they aren't married. They should get married. Maybe in time. But people talk about their clothes and Max kicking the other one. They are children. All natural children. Nothing fancy. I love it. Leave them alone and let them live their life. I hope they make it in this terrible mess up world. Everyone in Hollywood has nannies. I wish I had one!

Posted at 6:27PM on Sep 3rd 2007 by Ann

155. Why don't Angie and Brad adopt Britney's kids?

Those poor kids need parents. Then K-Fed would have to get a job and take care of his other kids with Shar Jackson.

Everything solved!! LOL

Posted at 8:29PM on Sep 3rd 2007 by Gigi

156. In response to #154, how do you know Angelina has an eating disorder? Did you hear it from her own lips or is that something you are assuming or reading in the gossip pages? Did anyone even think that perhaps the loss of her mother (who she was very close to) has contributed to her recent weight loss? If you have never grieved over the loss of a parent who you were close to, then you don't know what it is like. Stop being so critical of a situation that you know nothing about.

Posted at 8:33PM on Sep 3rd 2007 by Jazzyjalaska

157. It's great that they adopt. (I have adopted 2 from the U.S.) Maybe this time they will adopt from the here. The problem I have is that they use these children to get in the media. They are always with the adopted children but hardly ever with their daughter Shiloh. There are a lot of famous people who adopt but you don't see them getting their kids pictures out to the media. I wonder if Brad and Angie get paid per picture! Something to think about.

Posted at 8:43PM on Sep 3rd 2007 by me

158. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Posted at 9:27PM on Sep 3rd 2007 by InMyHumbleOpinion

159. Oh puh-leeze, I am so sick of these two. They are not the only people in the U.S. who have adopted orphans from other countries. They just get all the press for it. BDD. My daughter and her husband aren't famous but they adopted a Russian orphan and they had to wait a long time to go through all the hoops and barrels to do it. No special breaks for them. If these two are really committed to each other and their kids than let's see them get married.

Posted at 10:20PM on Sep 3rd 2007 by Alexis

160. I don't know the Jolie-Pitts, so I will withhold from judging their character, despite my opinions. (My tongue is bleeding.)

My concern is for the children. The number of children, their ethnicity, and whether they were adopted or born to the couple, SHOULD NOT MATTER.

Unfortunately, this globe-trotting lifestyle is not conducive to a healthy upbringing for children, who require stability, protection, boundaries, and tons and tons of love and affection.

If parents are able to provide these things, they are succeeding in the most important areas. I cannot imagine how this very "publicly busy" couple can possibly provide all of these things to 4 children, let alone 5.

I have deep and genuine concern for these children, and I wonder if the adopted ones were really "saved" from anything. Besides, weren't dozens left behind? How can you pick one, when you can help all. Personally, I couldn't walk away from the left-behinds. But, I digress.

In summary, let me just remind everyone:

PARENTING IS THE MOST IMPORTANT JOB IN THE WORLD!!!

Posted at 9:48PM on Sep 3rd 2007 by InMyHumbleOpinion

161. Does anyone out there have any professional expertise regarding the effects on children of constant traveling?.

I know if you explain things to a child so they understand on their specific level that comforts them, but, I wonder what the long term emotional effect will be on these children. From what I've read, children require stability and a routine to feel secure and safe, but, constant traveling is a routine in itself isn't it?.

I don't doubt that Brad and Angie love these children and would rather not leave them behind, because their lifestyles dictate traveling. I am assuming that Brad and Angelina want their children to experience the world,but, at such young ages, is a child capable of remembering or, understanding the value of being exposed to different cultures, is a child able to appreciate the ability to travel at will?. I don't think children can appreciate the world situations on that level, because they're not mentally capable, their minds have not yet developed to think logically.

I venture to think that when these children become adults, we will hear differing views about their childhoods. Each child may have a different reaction to their family dynamic.

Three children can grow up in the same home and come away with differing views and reactions to the same experiences,and , can recall completely different events because each event meant something specific to one childs personality.

I hope these chidren grow to become emotionally secure with lots of self esteem, knowing unconditional love and support from both parents equally.

Posted at 9:56PM on Sep 3rd 2007 by Joan

162. Many people have lifestyles where they travel a lot. Ever hear of military "brats?"

So many people have problems. Marriage problems, emotional prolems, financial problems, yet people still manage to have families and raise kids. These two are no different just because they have money.

It doesn't look like nannies do all the child-rearing here. You see this family together all the time. I wish I could afford a nanny myself to help out.

It looks like people are just hunting for stuff to hate these two for. Let it go. Jennifer Aniston is history. She has moved on, as has Brad. People break up. They start over. Maybe the bitter lunatics on here should do the same.

Posted at 11:01PM on Sep 3rd 2007 by TMZDUH

163. Any woman would be better off single than with Brad Pitt. The man is a nut job and he
is out for pr....

Posted at 7:23AM on Sep 4th 2007 by no fan

164. I wish these two would open a celebrity abused child rescue mission. They should then take Danilynn smith/Hogan/Birkhead/Stearn as there first rescue. She and Shiloh would make great companions. Then step into the Spears Federline household and save the boys. Lastly they can prepare interventions in the Richey / Madden household. ( Better to be prepared early) And who knows what Hilton, Olsen twins and Lohan may pop out in the near future. All of them are disasters. At least these two love there children.

Posted at 11:59AM on Sep 4th 2007 by Wow

165. Brad is going to be finacially wrecked. They'll divorce and he'll be paying big bucks in child support.

Posted at 7:54AM on Sep 4th 2007 by paying child support