Brangelina: We're Ready for More!

Brad Pitt will be on permanent diaper duty if he and Angelina have their way.

When asked if they were ready for more kids, Pitt said, "Yeah, we're ready."

Said Pitt during an interview with an Italian TV station during the Venice Film Festival, having kids, "is the most fun I've had and also the biggest pain ... I've ever experienced. I love it and can't recommend it any more highly -- although sleep is nonexistent."

So, when will Shiloh, Maddox, Pax and Zahara (is that everyone?) have a new bro or sis? Stay tuned!

Tags: angelina jolie, AngelinaJolie, brad pitt, BradPitt

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 7 of 12) Previous 15 Comments | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

91. I think they should create a stable environment for the kids they already have before they get more. Why can't this family stay in one place for more than a few days? It can't be easy for a kid who is thrust into this family and doesn't speak the same language to not even stay in the same house for more than a few nights.

Posted at 10:27PM on Sep 2nd 2007 by Leslie

92. #89 - moofy --- Bravo!!!!!
well Said.

Posted at 11:19PM on Sep 2nd 2007 by Anonymous

93. I think that they need to stop adopting any more kids. What do they want to do, screw these poor kids up for life. I was adopted, my family had 2 natural kids, and 3 adopted, us adopted kids stuck together, and the other two stayed together. We did this because we knew the difference. I feel bad for Shilo, she is all alone. Madd is going to start picking on the others because he was always stuck to Ang and if you look at it basically still is. So he is going to see anymore as compitition, poor Pax. Take it from someone who has been there, it is not a loving environment. Take time for each child to get in their time, then slowly introduce more that way everyone is secure in their place in the family.

I think any agency that allows them to "shop" for more kids, should loose their license. It does not matter how much money a person has, it matters on how much time and love they have to nurture each child. Money is not everything. Look at Ang what is she teaching her daughters, to be bolimic, or anerexic (sorry if they are spelt wrong), and Brad is teaching the boys to be spineless. It is pathetic!!

Posted at 11:05PM on Sep 2nd 2007 by adopted40

94. #50 Beverly - How else would your propose to draw attention to a cause, such as the plight of refugees, which AJ did last week without a camera? They donate plenty of money personally, the publicity is to draw light to the situation, that is the UN's Requirement from there ambassador...... DUH..... End of story.

Posted at 11:22PM on Sep 2nd 2007 by Ted

95. Why cant brad see the writttng on the wall.
She is just using him to watch her kids while she makes her movies.
How can she be a good mom if she wont feed herself.
She needs rehabe for the drinkng and speed pilll popping.
Something is ust realy off about tem.

Posted at 11:07PM on Sep 2nd 2007 by Brad is so dumb

96. Let's see if I get this right, they are ready for more.. last week in New York, the Week before in Chicago, the week before in LA, Praque before that, Cannes before that, now Venice. Sure they want more, they just have to hire another nanny! Why don't they go home and stay there for about 20 years and raise the kids they already bought? SICK OF THESE TWO! WHY WON'T THEY GO AWAY!

Posted at 11:13PM on Sep 2nd 2007 by SICKOFTHELOONIES

97. im sorry i think he should have stayed with jennifer... this woman is putting him in the poor house! Not to mention then do not look like a fun cool couple.

Posted at 12:43PM on Sep 8th 2007 by Lynn

98. I have travelled extensively over the world, including the third world. Anyone who has not seen these places for themselves cannot imagine what the conditions are for the people there, let alone an orphan with little to no hope. While you sit in your ivory towers throwing stones at Jolie for her choices, there are three children in her home, who have gotten the gift of hope & love from a women your crucifying. You cannot imagine what life is like without hope.

I don't know if Aj & BP are good people or parents, I can't speculate into there life anymore than anyone else can. But Adopting a child and saving them from there daily subexistance is a very good thing.

Posted at 11:24PM on Sep 2nd 2007 by Broaden your minds already

99. #98 - Lynn - Too bad for you.

BP is a big boy now, and can choose for himself who he wants to be with. He would have stayed if he loved it there. Get over it

Posted at 11:25PM on Sep 2nd 2007 by Anonymous

100. it would be ok for more kids if one or both of the parents were full time at home, hands on parents,, but they are not,, and will not be,, they are too much inlove with hollyweird and their "helping of the world"
why bring more kids into this mess?
these kids need a stable home and at least one stable parent
when there is a stay at home parent ,, reading to them , teaching them,, making them lunch,, giving them special time all day and night long,, a child will thrive,,
but not in this bad place these kids are in right now,,
hotel to hotel,, city to city,, that is rough on kids,, small kids are never happy like this,,
they need to settle down at some point,, put down roots and make a deal that one parent is always home with the kids ,, raising them right,,
this is just horrible to sit back and watch happen to these kids
very very very wrong!!

Posted at 11:28PM on Sep 2nd 2007 by just take care of the kiddie you have

101. So, Ms. Jolie decided to buy another handbag. 5 children, HUH? They are never with their 'parents', they have nannies and mannies and are with them much more than their 'parents'. The newest adornment could not possibly be Iraqi because she spent 4 1/2 nanoseconds in Iraq.
It is not humanly possible for parents to give the amount of love necessary that 5 kids require. Their time ( the children ) is filled with strangers caring for them, not those two people.
I just love the 'Jennifer just could not hold on to her man' crap'. All part of the persons of huge verbiage, ie: jealous/haters/losers. My oh my, if my vocabulary were as large in volume, I would never have to run my business one day longer!
Young ladies, get an education and stop idolizing ACTORS, that is what they are. I could understand Ghandi, Gloria Steinem, Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King but ACTORS!

Posted at 11:40PM on Sep 2nd 2007 by RL

102. People like most of us on this board put down roots because it is our culture, which is largely driven by how much money we have (or don't). I don't have a ton of money, so my kids have one roof over their heads these days. However, I have known people who have traveled the world from the time they were itty bitty and their reaction to the one roof/one address business that many Americans think is the ultimate was simply that so long as they were all together, they _were_ home.

These kids have friends, namely each other, and as none of them is exactly school age now, you can fit in a lot of travel without too much upheaval.

As far as how many kids these two are having and the spacing between them, ironic that they are on the same timeline that people used to be in the "good old" rural economy days, and before the advent of 99.99% effective birth control? Catholics bred like this until the 60s and even 70s, and I don't recall those people being so roundly criticized. If they can afford the kids and things go well, fine. Stay at home parenting and staying in one place is not necessarily superior or best for everyone. In this case, these kids go everywhere with them and can even be on set with them. Same diff.

Posted at 11:42PM on Sep 2nd 2007 by G550

103. Um....it's STOP BUYING KIDS THEY'RE (as in they are) NOT TOYS.....NOT THERE!!!!

Posted at 12:03AM on Sep 3rd 2007 by kiki

104. the way they keep collecting children, they're like those people who keep getting pet after pet, because they can't stand for them to suffer. The problem is what happens when they no longer fit into their lives???

Posted at 11:59PM on Sep 2nd 2007 by shasha

105. RL - Doubt that everyone who is dissagreeing with you is strickly 'Young" or a " Lady" .
I also doubt that you are doing any less 'Idolizing" of an Actor than anyone else here. What else would have drawn you to this article and blog? If you were not interested in Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt you never would have bothered to comment.
Could it be your need to criticize an " ACTOR " who is so vastly below you?That just makes you a patronizing hypocrite. This is an entertainment gossip websight....... Not a world history, political or social commentary websight. Perhaps you need to review what you are doing here. Your spouting of hate makes you no better than anyone else, your in the same muck as the rest of us.

Posted at 12:26AM on Sep 3rd 2007 by The Worlds filled with Hypocrisies

Previous 15 Comments | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments