Donna to Nikki: Keep Your Money!

76. #66 I knew you would have to respond. Also, I knew you would try to change what you so obviously said in your previous comment. If you sincerely believe no one should believe everything Donna D'Errico might write about in her book, how about if I don't believe everything you comment or write about in your posts to this article. So, if you are not a groupie, then you still remain a woman living somewhere lusting after a man she will never meet. Plenty of women out there just like you, die hard fans of Nikki Sixx. He is so cool and so sexy. Whatever! The woman who just divorced him and DID "hang out" with him just walked away from a lot of money. She is just glad it is all over with. What exactly does that say to you, honestly? Would you "have what it takes" to do that? Don't bother replying to my comment here. Your comments are lame and defensive. I still say the woman shows class and strength and so much more dignity than your comments about this article.

Posted at 10:55PM on Dec 2nd 2007 by ishethedevil?

77. Are you totally blind? How do you not see I am completely on her side? OMG

My previous comment SAID: " (tho I do hope no one ***buys*** everything she's going to write "

BUY .. as in BELIEVE. GET IT NOW?! Where ya from? You never heard "I'm not buying that" when someone tells ya something?

Which is how I corrected myself with my second post. "As in I mean I hope no one *****believes***** everything she's going to write",

How about you read better? I started this off complaining about blind loyalty and, quite obviously defended Donna through the entire post. You took ONE sentence out of all that, that you read wrong, and fixated on it.

And you can reply back if you want to, but no, don't expect me to be back to keep this going. THAT is what would make me lame.

Posted at 11:56PM on Dec 2nd 2007 by you chicks make me want to vomit

78. #68 how can you be "completely on someone's side" yet say don't believe everything she writes in a book? Go take a cold shower, you must be lusting again or something. (and I am waiting for your next comment, after your cold shower) You contradict yourself in every other sentence in your comments.

Posted at 12:06AM on Dec 3rd 2007 by yesnikkisuxx

79. lay off #68--she is one of the few who isn't suckered by the Nikki blinders like the rest. She even admitted to being a fan of his, yet still sees what is really going on behind the image he is currently putting out there for his adoring public. She sees the injustice of what was done to Donna after everything that woman did for him and his children. Now, if only the rest of these clowns could take off their blinders long enough they would be able to see him for the narcissistic jerk he is and support our fellow woman/mother, Donna....she is like so many of us women who have been screwed over in our divorce after devoting a lifetime to their husband and children. And 3 of the kids she devoted a lifetime to weren't even hers!

He stopped letting her see those kids when she filed for divorce? He rejected her son after raising him and that little boy calling him daddy? Whoa. I'm seeing red now. I'm sorry, but that dude is a hypocrite and an ass.

Posted at 12:37AM on Dec 3rd 2007 by nikkisuxx

80. #70 well said

Posted at 12:47AM on Dec 3rd 2007 by ishethedevil?

81. #68 I apologize

Posted at 12:54AM on Dec 3rd 2007 by yesnikkisuxx

82. Nikki is the classic bad boy that every woman wants to change, hell he is THE bad boy. Donna probably married him thinking that her love would transform his rock star ways and he'd do a complete 180 for her. This is always a mistake as it never really happens with men who aren't rock stars, I can't even imagine it happening with a man who has drugs and women available on demand.

Nikki is super hot no doubt, but I wouldn't want to marry him. Screw his brains out, hell yeah, but marriage, no.

Posted at 3:13PM on Dec 3rd 2007 by Nikki is hot

83. I wanted to come back and comment on somethings that were said to me because I still feel Donna doesn't deserve any spousal support. I have been married for 15 years and am in my mid 30's. I am an independent woman and work hard for a living. I would NEVER expect my husband (if we got divorced) to support me financially. Its not who I am. I am very capable of making a living on my own and am to independent to whine for my ex to support me the rest of my life. I think the only thing wanting money from your ex shows is that you're selfish and want to get back at your ex by screwing him financially. And that to me is childish. I suppose only in Hollywood that is expected though. Any of my friends who have ever been divorced haven't gotten any kind of support from their ex husbands, its not even an issue, and they too have raised kids and some have put their careers on hold too to raise their family...its not that big of a thing....no one even mentions "they deserve " it....but maybe thats only in Hollywood again.

And one thing as I was reading through these comments is the people who are defending Donna so much are also calling Nikki a loser etc....but yet Donna wanted this "loser" to be her sons father and was married to this "loser" for 10 years. So why did she stay married to him for so long if he was such a loser and want him to be her sons father if he is such a loser? Was it only so she could get child support from him for her son?

And to those of you who say we are blinded by Nikki cuz we are in lust with him is not the case here either. Nikki may be an ass for all I know.....and so could Donna be for that matter. Those of you who are defending Donna so loyally the same could be said about you to then I suppose. But my comments have nothing to do with if I like Nikki or Donna. I was just trying to make the comment that I think its a good thing she walked away and took a more independent move. Maybe its the law in CA that the spouse is entitled to half but to say she deserves it is another story.

Posted at 10:53PM on Dec 3rd 2007 by jess

84. There is an economic reason for spousal support. It has nothing to do with "screwing" a spouse out of anything. There is a value to the community (being the husband and wife) for what one has done that allows the other to grow their career. In this case, Donna provided care for the children - Nikki's children. This time allowed him to enhance his career and the monies that came with it. If she had not been primary caretaker for the children a nanny could have done so, but the result would not have been the same. Nannies come and go, and Nikki would have had a lot less free time to work on his career. This enhancement of his career means he has earning capability a lot higher than hers. Her efforts contributed to his increase in ability to ean an income.

This is true for any marriage - one spouse's efforts cause the income of the other to rise. Should that spouse be harmed by that? At the end of a 5 or 10 or 20 year period one spouse has an earning ability of hundreds of thousands and the other has to flip burgers? To those NOT being compensated for loss of income, I say, read the family code in your state and find out why you are cheating yourself out of what is yours.

Posted at 12:24AM on Dec 4th 2007 by citylawguy

85. just a thought on reading all these comments. So Donna walked away. She was worn out from trying to defend herself in court, having to flee a fire, having to deal with Nikki's "dream team" of lawyers, having to deal with defending herself with Nikki's lies (the father of their child), having to deal with her son being forgotten by a man he called daddy, having to try to get a career going again, having to deal with what she is going thru being in the public eye. Nikki has been married before, had children by a previous marriage, manipulated his first wife during their divorce, trying to manipulate his second wife the same way, at the same time, trying to show the public with his new book what a "turned around, now clean" guy he is. I am sure she did help in many ways to enhance and build back up his career during their marriage. My thought is this, and this is what came to my mind. Nikki has said in different interviews, and thru his wanting to help runaway boys, that his dad left him, that he had such bad memories of his childhood, his father leaving, etc. What about the little boy of Donna's? If he looked to Nikki for ten years as a father, ended up calling Nikki daddy, Nikki was going to adopt him, where did all of that care go? Is this a "like father, like son"? Nikki? Haven't you done what you hated your own father for doing to you? Didn't it bother you for years and years? Just wondering how Nikki can go on tv and say that one-fourth of his earnings from his new book will go to help runaway boys when he turned his back on a little boy who lived with him in his own home and called him daddy. Is that all there is? Just wondering about those five kids, Donna and Nikki's. In a few years, they will be older and out on their own. Just wondering what memories they are bringing with them to adulthood and what kind of adults they will be, after living thru this breakup of their parents. Maybe Nikki can write a book about it. Or, maybe he can do something about it right now, instead of waiting to see the outcome like the rest of us will see in a few short years.

Posted at 9:26AM on Dec 4th 2007 by whatgoesaroundcomesaround

86. Ok, I am a huge fan of Motley Crue and read the Dirt, etc, etc. But I will say that Nikki did this girl wrong. He wrote in his book how he loved her, how he never had something so wonderful. Yet, he cheats on her while she is pregnant and walks out on her when she comes home from the hospital recovering from a C Section. The thing that really got me, was Donna had a small son and Nikki adopted him as his own and when they spilt, he would not have anything to do with this kid. Poor kid was suicidal. It makes me mad, b.c he was left by his dad and should know how it felt. Donna also raised Nikki's children from Brandi, so sorry, I am with Donna on this and SHAME on you Nikki!!

Posted at 9:29PM on Dec 5th 2007 by BlueZ

87. FIBiker is Nikki Sixx himself---hi there Mr. Suxx!

Posted at 10:38PM on Dec 5th 2007 by nikkisuxx

88. After reading a lot of these comments, plus hearing news here and there, and also seeing Nikki Sixx on tv, I must say that he may think he has won really big in this second divorce of his, but it surely seems to me that he is a loser, but, more than that, he has lost a great looking, classy, intelligent, caring wife, and will most likely lose any respect and admiration that he may have won recently through so much attention of the media of late. He may have lost some fans, respect and acceptance of many friends, but most of all, he is setting himself up to lose what most counts, when his children reach adulthood and really learn what their dad is really about, not just being a rock star, but a person, and what this person has done to others, that they knew, when you lose what your kids think of you, you cannot get that back. So, guess he is a loser after all.

Posted at 11:10PM on Dec 5th 2007 by Sam

89. What is the deal with that video???? I mean what was the point in even showing that? To show us all how much they both wanted the camera man to go away!!!!

Posted at 6:14AM on Dec 6th 2007 by M&M

90. OK, I WAS AND STILL AM A MOTLEY FAN, THE DIRT WAS PRETTY DETAILED , NOW NIKKIS BOOK, HEROIN DIARIES IS A TOP SELLER, HE IS SOBER AND YET STILL ACTING LIKE A DRY DRUNK, RUDE COMMENTS, SAME ATTITUDE . JUST SOBER??????? IM SORRY I AM PROBABLY WRONG , I THINK HE STILL IS THE SAME RUDE, EGO, SELF LOVING, VAIN PERSON HE ALWAYS HAS BEEN. I AM NOT JUDGING, BUT ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN YOUR WORDS NIKKI, PLEASE DONT FORGET, YOUR FANS MADE YOU WHO U R AND IM BEGINNING TO SECOND DOUBTS. I PRAY I AM WRONG, BUT THE ATTITUDE IS STILL THERE, AND ITS NOT HUMBLE , OR THANKFUL. IT MAKES ME WONDER WHAT DO U WANT THE WORLD TO SEE YOU AS???????????????????????????????????

Posted at 3:35AM on Dec 31st 2007 by Kim6669